scholarly journals Changes to the 1995 NCEP Operational Medium-Range Forecast Model Analysis–Forecast System

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Caplan ◽  
John Derber ◽  
William Gemmill ◽  
Song-You Hong ◽  
Hua-Lu Pan ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 1989-2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaqiong Zhou ◽  
Yuejian Zhu ◽  
Dingchen Hou ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
Jiayi Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract A new version of the Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS, v11) is tested and compared with the operational version (v10) in a 2-yr parallel run. The breeding-based scheme with ensemble transformation and rescaling (ETR) used in the operational GEFS is replaced by the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) to generate initial ensemble perturbations. The global medium-range forecast model and the Global Forecast System (GFS) analysis used as the initial conditions are upgraded to the GFS 2015 implementation version. The horizontal resolution of GEFS increases from Eulerian T254 (~52 km) for the first 8 days of the forecast and T190 (~70 km) for the second 8 days to semi-Lagrangian T574 (~34 km) and T382 (~52 km), respectively. The sigma pressure hybrid vertical layers increase from 42 to 64 levels. The verification of geopotential height, temperature, and wind fields at selected levels shows that the new GEFS significantly outperforms the operational GEFS up to days 8–10 except for an increased warm bias over land in the extratropics. It is also found that the parallel system has better reliability in the short-range probability forecasts of precipitation during warm seasons, but no clear improvement in cold seasons. There is a significant degradation of TC track forecasts at days 6–7 during the 2012–14 TC seasons over the Atlantic and eastern Pacific. This degradation is most likely a sampling issue from a low number of TCs during these three TC seasons. The results for an extended verification period (2011–14) and the recent two hurricane seasons (2015 and 2016) are generally positive. The new GEFS became operational at NCEP on 2 December 2015.


1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Bedrick ◽  
Anthony J. Cristaldi ◽  
Stephen J. Colucci ◽  
Daniel S. Wilks

1980 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1736-1773 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hollingsworth ◽  
K. Arpe ◽  
M. Tiedtke ◽  
M. Capaldo ◽  
H. Savijärvi

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (6) ◽  
pp. 2355-2364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Laroche ◽  
Pierre Gauthier ◽  
Monique Tanguay ◽  
Simon Pellerin ◽  
Josée Morneau

Abstract A four-dimensional variational data assimilation (4DVAR) scheme has recently been implemented in the medium-range weather forecast system of the Meteorological Service of Canada (MSC). The new scheme is now composed of several additional and improved features as compared with the three-dimensional variational data assimilation (3DVAR): the first guess at the appropriate time from the full-resolution model trajectory is used to calculate the misfit to the observations; the tangent linear of the forecast model and its adjoint are employed to propagate the analysis increment and the gradient of the cost function over the 6-h assimilation window; a comprehensive set of simplified physical parameterizations is used during the final minimization process; and the number of frequently reported data, in particular satellite data, has substantially increased. The impact of these 4DVAR components on the forecast skill is reported in this article. This is achieved by comparing data assimilation configurations that range in complexity from the former 3DVAR with the implemented 4DVAR over a 1-month period. It is shown that the implementation of the tangent-linear model and its adjoint as well as the increased number of observations are the two features of the new 4DVAR that contribute the most to the forecast improvement. All the other components provide marginal though positive impact. 4DVAR does not improve the medium-range forecast of tropical storms in general and tends to amplify the existing, too early extratropical transition often observed in the MSC global forecast system with 3DVAR. It is shown that this recurrent problem is, however, more sensitive to the forecast model than the data assimilation scheme employed in this system. Finally, the impact of using a shorter cutoff time for the reception of observations, as the one used in the operational context for the 0000 and 1200 UTC forecasts, is more detrimental with 4DVAR. This result indicates that 4DVAR is more sensitive to observations at the end of the assimilation window than 3DVAR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document